<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO WebMonkey &#187; web developer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seowebmonkey.com/stuff/web-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seowebmonkey.com</link>
	<description>Web design &#38; development with an ample sprinkle of SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Duplicate content in web applications</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web developer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowebmonkey.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguably, the most prevalent blockage to strong visibility within search results is created by inadvertent duplicated pages of content. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When first approaching a new SEO project, one of the very first research tasks is to assess the current status of the client site within the search engines &#8211; particularly, of course, Google. Right at the top of such tasks is a hunt for duplicate content and consequently, pages that have been filtered into the Supplementary Index.</p>
<h2>Defining duplicate content</h2>
<p>A search engine considers every unique URL to be the location of a single web page. It learns about such URLs by following links. Duplicate content occurs when a search engine follows more than one unique URLs that take it to a page of predominantly similar content &#8211; these pages do not need to be identical, just very similar (a defined ratio is something of a holy grail for optimisers and not clearly established).</p>
<p>Why is this important? A search engine will not display more than two pages from a website for a particular search. It makes an automated decision of which pages are the authoritative or originating version of that content, tucking the rest away at the end of the results: the Supplementary Index.</p>
<p>The damage to SEO comes from a number of factors, the two main causes being:</p>
<ol>
<li>The page you most want to surface may become inadvertently pushed into the Supplementary Index, thus giving searchers an inferior, poorly converting page to visit.</li>
<li>A major factor in search result visibility is the number (and quality) of links pointing to a page, but multiple URLs to a page frequently dilutes the combined effectiveness of back-links as the links point to different unique URLs. </li>
</ol>
<p>From my direct experience with sites over the past year in particular, duplicate content pages result in a cumulative deterioration of the entire site&#8217;s visibility in SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages). </p>
<p>If you have a site that is failing to rank well for even the least competitive search terms, such duplicate content is likely to be a contributing factor, and you will struggle to establish a firm footing until this problem is resolved.</p>
<h2>Spotting the damage</h2>
<p>Discovering duplicate content is relatively straightforward. Perform a search for your website on Google, like this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>site:yourdomain.com keyword</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>where <em>yourdomain.com</em> is your website&#8217;s domain, and <em>keyword</em> any terms for which you are trying to be visible. Run down to the very end of the results and if you see a message like this:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://seowebmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/supplimentary-index-message.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-115" title="supplimentary-index-message" src="http://seowebmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/supplimentary-index-message.png" alt="supplimentary-index-message" width="502" height="29" /></a></p>
<p>you have duplicate content!</p>
<h2>The cause</h2>
<h4>Content Management</h4>
<p>If you have a duplicate content issue, then I will bet your website runs on some form of content management. Blog applications are notoriously prone to these problems, with supplementary listing pages such as category summaries, tag summaries, archive lists, and search results, all in danger of generating pages with very similar content.</p>
<p>In addition, some content systems do not chose a single means of generating a URL for a item of content, linking to pages and posts in slightly different ways from different parts of the system. They may also fail to redirect all URLs to the canonical URL for that page or post.</p>
<h4>Identical meta data</h4>
<p>In addition, it is very common to come across sites with many &#8211; sometimes even all &#8211; their pages with identical titles and META descriptions . This is particularly prevalent once again with blogs, and also in the small business space where a company feels it must apply its company name and corporate blurb at the top of every page, thus not accurately reflecting that page&#8217;s actual content.</p>
<p>Page titles are very important in establishing the context of a page, and must be unique in order for the search engine to properly understand the page content.</p>
<h4>Too little unique textual content</h4>
<p>Pages with little unique text content can become regarded as duplicative because the majority of the content there is similar to everywhere else on the site. In these sparse content examples, the site-wide navigation, footer information, and other generic text, can form the majority of the textual content.</p>
<h4>Search, archive and summary pages</h4>
<p>As mentioned above, pages that summarise and list snippets of other content can easily appear to a search engine to be very similar but have unique URLs.</p>
<h4>www and non-www domains</h4>
<p>This one often surprises web developers, but www.yoursite.com is, to a search engine, a different website to yoursite.com. This means that if all your content is reachable via both those versions, your entire site is seen as being a duplicate!</p>
<p>It does not matter which you choose, but have one of those URL versions permanently redirected to the other.</p>
<h2>Repairing the damage</h2>
<p>Now that I have covered most of the indicators and causes, how about a means of fixing the problem? Watch out in a few days for specific techniques to repair and remove duplicated content within search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy OSX hosts file editing with GasMask</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/easy-osx-hosts-file-editing-with-gasmask/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/easy-osx-hosts-file-editing-with-gasmask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosts file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web developer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowebmonkey.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not often I come across a new utility that combines simplicity with easing a regular point of pain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>As a web developer, editing your local machine&#8217;s hosts file is not an infrequent task (If you don&#8217;t know what a hosts file is, then there&#8217;s a very good chance you will not find this little application useful!).</h3>
<p>You could use some archaic unix command line text editor (I&#8217;m going to get it in the neck for that comment, I&#8217;m sure), or open up something like BBEdit &#8211; my editor of choice &#8211; and navigating to the file &#8211; a location that no matter how often I go there, I can never remember the precise path.</p>
<p>GasMark saves you the hassle. It is, simpy, a direct line to your hosts file, allowing editing on the fly as easily as clicking its Dock or menu bar icons, or using its customisable hotkeys.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really nnothing else to say other than save yourself some pain and <a href="http://www.clockwise.ee/gasmask/">download GasMask</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/easy-osx-hosts-file-editing-with-gasmask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
