<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO WebMonkey &#187; experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seowebmonkey.com/stuff/experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seowebmonkey.com</link>
	<description>Web design &#38; development with an ample sprinkle of SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Overcoming duplicate content filters &#8211; back-links are everything</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-filters-backlinks/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-filters-backlinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowebmonkey.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gaining Google visibility when your website content solely duplicates existing content can be tough. Here is one method of overcoming the duplicate competition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I bet you are wondering &#8220;Why on earth would you want to duplicate content that already exists?&#8221; Well, putting the darker flavours of SEO/SEM to one side, many sites in the web2.0 world  aggregate content legitimately scraped from other sites. So to understand how the duplicate content filter can be overcome, I thought a little experiment was in order.</p>
<h2>The Duplicate Content Filter</h2>
<p>Google dislikes presenting multiple search results that contain the same content. Instead, it decides which is the most authoritative original source of that content from all the duplicates it has in its index, and presents just that one. The rest are filtered into the supplementary index &#8211; all that extra content you can see when you see something like this at the end of your search results:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 1 already displayed.<br />
If you like, you can <span style="color: #3366ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">repeat the search with the omitted results included</span></span>.</em></p></blockquote>
<h2>An experiment to become the authority</h2>
<p>I wanted to test the power of backlinks as an indicator of authority above all else. The outline of the experiment is straightforward:</p>
<ol>
<li>Create a brand new website</li>
<li>Fill it with content that already exists on other, more established websites</li>
<li>Create back-links pointing to it</li>
<li>Do not market the site in any other way</li>
</ol>
<p><em>I am not going to link to the site itself here, as I am now isolating it from normal, organic link targets to perform another experiment.</em></p>
<p>Content for the site was selected from some freely available PLR (Public Label Rights) articles which can be legally reproduced. Such articles are also generally already published elsewhere. In my case, a search for specific chunks of article texts showed most articles had already been published across 6-10 other websites, some new, some quite established.</p>
<h4>Getting indexed</h4>
<p>Adding a link to the footer of a very healthy blog got the brand new domain added to the Google index within 24 hours.</p>
<h4>Building back-links</h4>
<p>In addition to the main purpose of this test, I also used it to try out <a title="Link building with Linkvana" href="http://seowebmonkey.com/go/linkvana">link building service Linkvana</a>. A full review of my experience with Linkvana will be here soon, but in a nutsheell, it provides the ability to create unique backlinks from a plethora of specially managed blogs, but without the potentially damaging drawbacks of usinga link-farm.</p>
<div align="center"><a target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/lv5day"><img border="0" src="http://www.linkvana.com/images/affiliatetools/Linkvana468x60-trial.jpg" alt="Click here for Linkvana" width="468" height="60" /></a></div>
<p>Over a period of three weeks I used Linkvana exclusively to create just 15 back-links into the new content, both deep-linking and to the home page.</p>
<h4>The outcome</h4>
<p>After just a week of link-building, searching for specific chunks of my published PLR text returned my site <strong>at the top of the search results</strong>, with all the other pages containing the same PLR article, pushed into the supplemental index as duplicate content. This despite all the other sites having the advantage of greater domain age and having already published that content.</p>
<h2>The conclusion</h2>
<p>Duplicate content is one of the most discussed, and misunderstood, aspects of Google&#8217;s search alorhythm, but can be overcome with pure link bulding.</p>
<p>The number of quality links pointing at duplicate content, seems to be the primary metric for assessing that site&#8217;s authority. Of course, this assumption must be tempered against any existing authority held by other sites with the same content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-filters-backlinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
