<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO WebMonkey &#187; domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seowebmonkey.com/stuff/domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seowebmonkey.com</link>
	<description>Web design &#38; development with an ample sprinkle of SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>New GoDaddy promo code for 2010-2011</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/new-godaddy-promo-code-for-2009-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/new-godaddy-promo-code-for-2009-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowebmonkey.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New codes valid untill July 2011: MTECH410 10% &#124; MTECH411 20% +$50 &#124; MTECH412 30%/.com &#124; MTECH125 25% +$100 &#124; MINOR20H1 20% off hosting &#124; MINORSSL SSL cert for $12.99]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>June 2010 UPDATE &#8211; A new set of codes recently landed that will be valid until summer 2011!</strong></p>
<p><strong>MTECH410</strong> <strong>10% discount</strong> on your entire order [copy code or <a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech8">use</a>]</p>
<p><strong>MTECH411</strong> <strong>20% off</strong> your order over £35 (~$56) [copy code or <a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech9">use</a>]</p>
<p><strong>MTECH125</strong> <strong>25% off</strong> your order over $100</p>
<p><strong>MTECH412</strong> <strong>30% off</strong> .com domain names (can also be used on renewals and multiple year registrations) [copy code or <a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech10">use</a>]</p>
<p><strong>MINOR20H1</strong> gets 20% off web hosting [copy code or <a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=minor20h">use</a>]</p>
<p><strong>MINORSSL</strong> standard SSL certificates for $12.99 [copy code or <a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=minorssl">use</a>]</p>
<p>Click any of the above codes to have the discount automatically applied. Your discount value will be clearly displayed on your shopping cart at checkout. You may try different codes to see which one provides the best discount, but only one code can be applied to a single order.</p>
<p>GoDaddy codes are used at checkout, entering them into your shopping cart before you complete your order. There are no limits on the number of times you can use them, but some products and services are exempt form the discounts &#8211; in particular, items that are already on discount promotion on the GoDaddy site.</p>
<p>If you already have them, these older codes are no longer valid:<br />
10% MTECH8<br />
20% MTECH9<br />
30$ .com&#8217;s MTECH10<br />
25% MTECH25<br />
<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">10% discount </span><strong><a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech8"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">MTECH1<br />
</span></a><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">20% off orders over £35 (~$56) </span><strong><a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech9"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">MTECH2<br />
</span></a><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">30% off .com domain names &amp; renewals </span><a href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech10"><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">MTECH330</span></strong></a></span></strong></span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/new-godaddy-promo-code-for-2009-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duplicate content in web applications</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web developer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seowebmonkey.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguably, the most prevalent blockage to strong visibility within search results is created by inadvertent duplicated pages of content. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When first approaching a new SEO project, one of the very first research tasks is to assess the current status of the client site within the search engines &#8211; particularly, of course, Google. Right at the top of such tasks is a hunt for duplicate content and consequently, pages that have been filtered into the Supplementary Index.</p>
<h2>Defining duplicate content</h2>
<p>A search engine considers every unique URL to be the location of a single web page. It learns about such URLs by following links. Duplicate content occurs when a search engine follows more than one unique URLs that take it to a page of predominantly similar content &#8211; these pages do not need to be identical, just very similar (a defined ratio is something of a holy grail for optimisers and not clearly established).</p>
<p>Why is this important? A search engine will not display more than two pages from a website for a particular search. It makes an automated decision of which pages are the authoritative or originating version of that content, tucking the rest away at the end of the results: the Supplementary Index.</p>
<p>The damage to SEO comes from a number of factors, the two main causes being:</p>
<ol>
<li>The page you most want to surface may become inadvertently pushed into the Supplementary Index, thus giving searchers an inferior, poorly converting page to visit.</li>
<li>A major factor in search result visibility is the number (and quality) of links pointing to a page, but multiple URLs to a page frequently dilutes the combined effectiveness of back-links as the links point to different unique URLs. </li>
</ol>
<p>From my direct experience with sites over the past year in particular, duplicate content pages result in a cumulative deterioration of the entire site&#8217;s visibility in SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages). </p>
<p>If you have a site that is failing to rank well for even the least competitive search terms, such duplicate content is likely to be a contributing factor, and you will struggle to establish a firm footing until this problem is resolved.</p>
<h2>Spotting the damage</h2>
<p>Discovering duplicate content is relatively straightforward. Perform a search for your website on Google, like this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>site:yourdomain.com keyword</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>where <em>yourdomain.com</em> is your website&#8217;s domain, and <em>keyword</em> any terms for which you are trying to be visible. Run down to the very end of the results and if you see a message like this:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://seowebmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/supplimentary-index-message.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-115" title="supplimentary-index-message" src="http://seowebmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/supplimentary-index-message.png" alt="supplimentary-index-message" width="502" height="29" /></a></p>
<p>you have duplicate content!</p>
<h2>The cause</h2>
<h4>Content Management</h4>
<p>If you have a duplicate content issue, then I will bet your website runs on some form of content management. Blog applications are notoriously prone to these problems, with supplementary listing pages such as category summaries, tag summaries, archive lists, and search results, all in danger of generating pages with very similar content.</p>
<p>In addition, some content systems do not chose a single means of generating a URL for a item of content, linking to pages and posts in slightly different ways from different parts of the system. They may also fail to redirect all URLs to the canonical URL for that page or post.</p>
<h4>Identical meta data</h4>
<p>In addition, it is very common to come across sites with many &#8211; sometimes even all &#8211; their pages with identical titles and META descriptions . This is particularly prevalent once again with blogs, and also in the small business space where a company feels it must apply its company name and corporate blurb at the top of every page, thus not accurately reflecting that page&#8217;s actual content.</p>
<p>Page titles are very important in establishing the context of a page, and must be unique in order for the search engine to properly understand the page content.</p>
<h4>Too little unique textual content</h4>
<p>Pages with little unique text content can become regarded as duplicative because the majority of the content there is similar to everywhere else on the site. In these sparse content examples, the site-wide navigation, footer information, and other generic text, can form the majority of the textual content.</p>
<h4>Search, archive and summary pages</h4>
<p>As mentioned above, pages that summarise and list snippets of other content can easily appear to a search engine to be very similar but have unique URLs.</p>
<h4>www and non-www domains</h4>
<p>This one often surprises web developers, but www.yoursite.com is, to a search engine, a different website to yoursite.com. This means that if all your content is reachable via both those versions, your entire site is seen as being a duplicate!</p>
<p>It does not matter which you choose, but have one of those URL versions permanently redirected to the other.</p>
<h2>Repairing the damage</h2>
<p>Now that I have covered most of the indicators and causes, how about a means of fixing the problem? Watch out in a few days for specific techniques to repair and remove duplicated content within search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/duplicate-content-web-content-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP .info &#8211; and I was just getting optimistic</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/rip-info-and-i-was-just-getting-optimistic/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/rip-info-and-i-was-just-getting-optimistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post I mentioned on how the infamous .info domain was gaining a little respectability and rising above the image of the “spammer’s domain”. This week, I am thinking all hope is lost.
The .info domain is administered by Afilias. They recently submitted a proposal to ICANN (the global domain registry) to enable them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>In a <a href="http://neildixon.com/is-info-grappling-back-its-credibility/">recent post</a> I mentioned on how the infamous .info domain was gaining a little respectability and rising above the image of the “spammer’s domain”. This week, I am thinking all hope is lost.</h3>
<p>The .info domain is administered by Afilias. They recently <a>submitted a proposal</a> to ICANN (the global domain registry) to enable them to shut down an abusive .info domain. On the surface this is perhaps a good thing, potentially scrubbing countless spam an scraper sites from the face of the web.</p>
<blockquote><p>Pursuant to Section 3.6.5 of the RRA, Afilias reserves the right to deny, cancel or transfer any registration or transaction, or place any domain name(s) on registry lock, hold or similar status,<br />
that it deems necessary, in its discretion;</p></blockquote>
<p>However, the criteria of what constitutes an “abusive domain” are suitably vague as to offer quite some discomfort to anyone with an existing, mature .info site.</p>
<blockquote><p>Other abusive behaviors, normally identified by a pattern of material deceit, defined motive, leveraged opportunity and often conducted in a repetitive manner with or without concealment</p></blockquote>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.seobook.com/poor-info-strategy-afilias">SEOBook</a> suggests a change in the pricing policy for .info domains, forcing them higher to remove the attraction to spammer webmasters who generate hundreds of domains, and I have to agree. Hit the spammers in their pockets.</p>
<p>The most worrying aspect of this is it could set a precedent for other domains. What if Verisign, the registry provider for .com and .net, had similar powers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/rip-info-and-i-was-just-getting-optimistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is .info grappling back its credibility?</title>
		<link>http://seowebmonkey.com/is-info-grappling-back-its-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://seowebmonkey.com/is-info-grappling-back-its-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ndixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/2008/06/02/is-info-grappling-back-its-credibility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long the domain of spammers, scrapers and splogs, the .info domain has suffered at the hands of less reputable websites.
But is that  on the change? Surfers take the domain less seriously, and there has been much talk about the search engines thinking similarly, de-ranking .info domains when returning search results on the premise that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Long the domain of spammers, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scraper_site">scrapers</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_blog">splogs</a>, the .info domain has suffered at the hands of less reputable websites.</h3>
<p>But is that  on the change? Surfers take the domain less seriously, and there has been much talk about the search engines thinking similarly, de-ranking .info domains when returning search results on the premise that it is likely content created by spammers. This may not be an entirely accurate assumption, however, as the search engine analysis of web page content is continually increasing in sophistication, this de-ranking may be wholly explained by correct targeting of low quality content.</p>
<p>Regardless of the search engines’ relationship with the .info, it seems amongst web users that it is considered less important than .com or even .net. Whether this is down to the spread of spam content using this domain cannot be determined.</p>
<p><strong>The .info turnaround</strong></p>
<p>In recent times, however, .info may be starting to regain its credibility. Countries are beginning to use it &#8211; quite accurately &#8211;  for their tourism or information sites (see <a rel="nofollow" href="http://spain.info">spain.info</a> as an example). With very high quality, authoritative and relevant content, these sites are proving that the .info domain can be more valuable than we think, and this will inevitably have an impact one way or another on the search engines. The more .info sites we create with high quality content, the more everyone begins to take it seriously.</p>
<p>For those searching for domain names, the .info extension provides some real bargain basement opportunities right now. Many registrars offer significant discounts on .info (right now, <a title="godaddy domain registration" rel="nofollow" href="http://godaddy.com/?isc=mtech1">GoDaddy</a>, for example, will charge you just $0.99/£0.50 for the first year’s <a href="http://neildixon.com/big-fat-godaddy-coupon-discount-code-list-2008/">domain registration</a>). Sadly, such bargains also attract the spammers, so .info is not as yet out of the water.</p>
<p>Still, when the .com and .net have already been taken, .info may soon once more be a viable option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seowebmonkey.com/is-info-grappling-back-its-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
