Overcoming duplicate content filters – back-links are everything
Published by on December 29th, 2008 13 Comments »
Gaining Google visibility when your website content solely duplicates existing content can be tough. Here is one method of overcoming the duplicate competition.
Now I bet you are wondering “Why on earth would you want to duplicate content that already exists?” Well, putting the darker flavours of SEO/SEM to one side, many sites in the web2.0 world aggregate content legitimately scraped from other sites. So to understand how the duplicate content filter can be overcome, I thought a little experiment was in order.
The Duplicate Content Filter
Google dislikes presenting multiple search results that contain the same content. Instead, it decides which is the most authoritative original source of that content from all the duplicates it has in its index, and presents just that one. The rest are filtered into the supplementary index – all that extra content you can see when you see something like this at the end of your search results:
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 1 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
An experiment to become the authority
I wanted to test the power of backlinks as an indicator of authority above all else. The outline of the experiment is straightforward:
- Create a brand new website
- Fill it with content that already exists on other, more established websites
- Create back-links pointing to it
- Do not market the site in any other way
I am not going to link to the site itself here, as I am now isolating it from normal, organic link targets to perform another experiment.
Content for the site was selected from some freely available PLR (Public Label Rights) articles which can be legally reproduced. Such articles are also generally already published elsewhere. In my case, a search for specific chunks of article texts showed most articles had already been published across 6-10 other websites, some new, some quite established.
Getting indexed
Adding a link to the footer of a very healthy blog got the brand new domain added to the Google index within 24 hours.
Building back-links
In addition to the main purpose of this test, I also used it to try out link building service Linkvana. A full review of my experience with Linkvana will be here soon, but in a nutsheell, it provides the ability to create unique backlinks from a plethora of specially managed blogs, but without the potentially damaging drawbacks of usinga link-farm.
Over a period of three weeks I used Linkvana exclusively to create just 15 back-links into the new content, both deep-linking and to the home page.
The outcome
After just a week of link-building, searching for specific chunks of my published PLR text returned my site at the top of the search results, with all the other pages containing the same PLR article, pushed into the supplemental index as duplicate content. This despite all the other sites having the advantage of greater domain age and having already published that content.
The conclusion
Duplicate content is one of the most discussed, and misunderstood, aspects of Google’s search alorhythm, but can be overcome with pure link bulding.
The number of quality links pointing at duplicate content, seems to be the primary metric for assessing that site’s authority. Of course, this assumption must be tempered against any existing authority held by other sites with the same content.
13 Responses to “Overcoming duplicate content filters – back-links are everything”
Leave a Reply
COMMENT APPROVAL POLICY: Please use a genuine name and email address for your comment. Please use your real name, not SEO keyword text. Please limit any outgoing links in your comment to a maximum of ONE, which should not be the same as you entered URL in the form. Please be considerate to other commenters. Please be relevant to the blog post and contribute to the discussion. Blatant link generation comments (we get a lot of those!) will be deleted. LICENSE By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Your comment may be edited or removed by a site admin if deemed necessary.
linkvana is definitely a great backlink generation service. i use neurolinker because it is a lot cheaper, but linkvana should be considered by anyone who can afford it.
Sounds really interesting indeed. I’ll harvest this subject to find out more information…
I’m curious to know how many backlinks and keywords used to get the first page and period of time it took. I went through similar exercise recently and I got my site to rank 4 in 60 days.
I have spent 1 hour / day submitting my site to directories, writing in blogs and exchanging links.
@SRM: In this case about 20 links targeted over 5 keywords over about three weeks, popped one of the web pages on page one of Google, though not for the most competitive keyword target. And that’s the key, the time taken to get to a prominent position will vary mainly based on the level of competition fighting for your chosen keywords. If you are up against established sites, with aged domains and content, then it’s going to be much tougher to rank high.
[...] duplicate content (PLR articles) and created under a brand new domain specifically for this test, I used Linkvana links exclusively and saw the site begin to rank quickly and rise above the other, more established sites [...]
Linkvana is great for someone who has several sites set up and ready to go. At that price you want to get it working for you right away. @$147/month, I would really have to think about it though.
thanks for the experiment.
One question, if I write an article on my website, and syndicate or publish the same exact article with the same title to 500 article directories or blog networks. In each article, I create a text backlink to my original article.
My article on my website will still get ranked?
Will the search engine consider me spamming?
According to Google this is fine so long as each article links back to the original. Google can then determine which is the originating, authorative source of the article, and which are the duplicates. The potential danger it that Google will mistake a duplicate for an original and then your original content might be effectively penalised, or reduced in authority.
I advise writing two articles in this case, one as the uniqur content on your site, the other to be spread around the article directories with links to your site. Each backlink still has very low influence, but the fact they are not duplicates of your site’s content will benefit.
Thanks For keeping it on target
Best Regards
Does anyone know if linkvana’s Blogs are seperated by relevance? I’d like to try the service but I really want to keep my links relative to my site. Thanks.
Linkvana blog posts are placed into a specific set of subject categories on each blog. So the blogs are not subject specific.
However, their newly released article network, is subject relevant, with entire article blogs being dedicated to a single category. Tha articles have the advantages of being longer (250+ words) and can contain three links.
The key to our success is being an article site which contains original content. No duplication Please. If you have already published an article elsewhere, we don’t want it. It will not have the same value to the search engines as a Unique Article does.
I found a selection of over 200 plus “Angela style backlinks” which your readers will benefit from, there’s no signup. The PDF can be downloaded directly from http://www.multiupload.com/SAWHQBTAM9 the links vary from PR1 to PR9 and sorted by pagerank.